Ge The Rudd Report

Have The Rudd Report Emailed To You Everyday When it's Published

Streetwise for Friday, July 10, 2020









*|MC:SUBJECT|*






View this email in your browser

Streetwise for Friday, July 10, 2020

As many readers of this column are aware, mutual funds, either bond or stock, are not among my favorite investment vehicles. To answer the continual questions as why, let me once again discuss an article in the New York Times delving into just that issue.

Dalbar, a Massachusetts research firm that has been studying the behavior of mutual fund investors for 25 years, reported that over a one year, and for periods of five, 10, 20 and 30 years, the average mutual fund investor has underperformed the markets for both stocks and bonds. Bond investors have generally failed to even keep up with inflation.

In the 30 years through December 2018, Dalbar found that the average bond mutual fund investor earned an average 0.26 percent annually, as compared to comparable inflation rate of 2.49 percent. Over the course of an entire generation, bond investors’ money shrank more than 2 percentage points a year in real terms.

This miserable record is not necessarily the fault of the bond market. The benchmark Bloomberg-Barclays Aggregate Bond Index returned 6.1 percent, annualized, over those 30 years. If you had held an index fund that simply tracked the bond market you would have earned about 6 percent a year, fees included.

The Dalbar results for 2018 are especially painful. The inflation rate was 1.93 percent, so investors would have had to earn that just that to tread water. Instead, the average stock fund investor lost 9.42 percent, for a gap of more than 11 percentage points.

Bond fund investors did a bit better. Their average investments declined “only” 2.84 percent, so they lagged inflation by more than 4.7 percentage points.

Data for stock mutual funds, when compared to the S&P 500 index, underperformed the index for a period ending December 2018 by 5.88% over 30 years, 3.46% over 10 years, and 4.35% over five years.

In other words, the average stock mutual fund investor has lagged the stock market, while investors in bond mutual funds have not kept up with inflation.

Ok, so what about dividend paying stocks. Let us look at what are referred to as the Dividend Aristocrats, or stocks that have been raising dividends for at least 25 years of which there are 65.

For 2020, ending June 30, the S&P 500 index had a return of -2.60%. The Dividend Aristocrats chalked up a return of -7.18%. For 2019, the S&P 500’s return was 31.49%, as compared to the Aristocrats of 29.90%. 

A basic weakness of the Aristocrats is that the number of companies from which to choose is too few. Using companies with 10-years of increasing dividends raises the number of potential candidates to 267.

Regardless of which universe you decide to select from, remember you are only performing an initial selection of potential investments. From there, two other critical steps are necessary.

The first is to determine the intrinsic value of every company you select, whether a dividend achiever, an aristocrat, or even a company not in either of those two categories.

Next, you want to perform a discounted cash flow analysis using specific models, such a free cash flow to the firm or a dividend discount model, or possibly a discounted earnings model. 

If you are quantitively oriented, consider using a free cash flow to equity model. Regardless of which model(s) you select, you want the intrinsic value to be higher than the current share price by a minimum of 5%. Not every model can or will meet the 5% criteria for a specific stock. However, one or two 5%+ successes is sufficient.

One web site that will calculate the free cash flow to the firm intrinsic value is ValuePro.net. However, some of the data for a company may need to be updated. Keep in mind that you are looking for a relative value. The degree to which the intrinsic value exceeds the share price is not relevant.

If the answer you receive using ValuePro is not consistent with what you would like, check the data being used carefully. Finally, remember that you still need to evaluate a company’s financial performance, supply chains, customer base and competition. Intrinsic value alone is a good place to start but is not sufficient.

Lauren Rudd is a financial writer and columnist. You can write to him at LVERudd@aol.com. Phone calls accepted between 9 AM and 3 PM at (941) 706-3449. For back columns please go to www.RuddReport.com.

Instagram

Facebook

LinkedIn

Copyright © *|CURRENT_YEAR|* *|LIST:COMPANY|*, All rights reserved.

*|IFNOT:ARCHIVE_PAGE|*
*|LIST:DESCRIPTION|*

Our mailing address is:

*|HTML:LIST_ADDRESS_HTML|* *|END:IF|*

Want to change how you receive these emails?
You can update your preferences or unsubscribe from this list.

*|IF:REWARDS|* *|HTML:REWARDS|*
*|END:IF|*






Get The Rudd Report

Have The Rudd Report Emailed To You Everyday When it's Published

100% Privacy Guaranteed. We will never share your information.